High Salary

Open sources describe an approach where confirmation of a high level of compensation compared to the market is used as one way to demonstrate the significance of the applicant's professional level. This is done by confirming that the applicant "costs more" than the average market rate. If there are no documents — they ask the boss to write a letter in the style: "This person receives/will receive compensation above market — and we believe this is justified," + specific examples of contribution (revenue, projects, contractors).

Discover new international opportunities right now

Complete your professional profile assessment in 2 minutes and find out:

What professional achievements you already have, even if you haven't given them much thought

How you can strengthen your public profile and international opportunities with PR professionals

Start the test and understand your possible path forward

The page you will be redirected to is exclusively related to building a professional profile and does not provide visa, immigration, or legal services and is in no way affiliated with the Knowledge Center educational platform.

Photo: Official USCIS website

For all questions regarding public profile building, publications, scholarly materials, interviews, and comprehensive professional positioning, we recommend the PR platform Persona System , which systematically works in this field, has been verified by us, and has signed the ethical memorandum on the Personal Destiny Care Approach.

On the "Specialists we recommend" page you can learn more about the Persona System platform, or choose other specialists who have also signed the ethical memorandum and work in this field.

Persona System provides exclusively PR and media support and does not provide legal or immigration advice.

We do not place paid advertising and do not receive payment from companies for placement in the "Specialists we recommend" section. This section includes only specialists and companies that have signed the ethical memorandum on the Personal Destiny Care Approach.

Below is a summary of practices and recommendations from licensed U.S. immigration attorneys. This is exclusively information from open sources and real cases, not legal advice or instructions specifically for your case. The final structure of evidence, letter texts, and filing strategy is composed exclusively by your licensed U.S. attorney.

The essence of the criterion is simple: you need to show that your compensation is significantly higher than that of most professionals in the same labor market, in the same profession, and for the same period. USCIS perceives this as an indicator that you belong to a small percentage of top professionals in your field. In short: you cost more because you bring more value. Yes, this is a pleasant moment, but you'll have to prove it with documents, not charisma.

What exactly USCIS evaluates

Comparability. Only comparison "relative to others in the field" matters. You need a relevant market (country/region), a relevant profession, and the same period.

Level. It's desirable to show upper percentiles (90th, 95th and above), not the "average temperature in the hospital."

Sources. Authoritative, with transparent methodology. Several independent sources are better than one.

Compensation formats. Salary, bonuses, stock options, fees, project rates — everything counts correctly and consistently.

What to submit as evidence of actual compensation

• Annual tax documents for relevant years (equivalent to American W-2/1099 or official certificates from tax authorities in your country).
• Employment/civil contracts with specified rates, bonuses, equity, premiums.
• Pay stubs for periods with variable payments with a brief explanation of fluctuations.
• Documents regarding additional forms of compensation (options, RSU, royalties, fees).

Open sources contain examples of how applicants demonstrate that their compensation is above market.

Select correct compensation sources tied to geography, position, level, and industry. Suitable options include: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), CareerOneStop, Foreign Labor Certification Data Center (FLCDatacenter), Levels.fyi (for technical roles), ERI Economic Research Institute, Mercer/Radford, Robert Half, Hays, Glassdoor, Payscale, SalaryExpert, ZipRecruiter. For countries outside the US, use government statistics and/or well-known international surveys with local breakdowns.

Public cases usually pay attention to market relevance and percentile levels.

Show percentiles. Compare your annual compensation with the 90th/95th percentile for your role and workplace for the same year. Here's how it's done:

Avoid simple USD conversion. Compare in the local currency of the relevant market. If adding a dollar equivalent — it's reference only and with a single exchange rate.

Typical mistakes described (and how to avoid them)

• Using averages instead of upper percentiles. Use research with percentile breakdowns, show specifically the "top."
• Mismatched profession in the source and yours. Solution: monitor role name accuracy, don't mix "similar" positions.
• Simple currency conversion. Solution: compare in local currency; if adding USD — only as reference.
• Fragmented income evidence. Solution: provide annual document packages, explain variations, reconcile figures between contracts, statements, and tax documents.
• Lack of local context for markets outside the US. Solution: show local percentiles and authoritative local sources.

Brief practical plan

Open descriptions of successful cases show a certain logic of material presentation. In such examples, applicants typically:

• maintain consistency of job title across all documents;
• provide annual tax forms or other official compensation confirmations;
• use several authoritative compensation sources specifically for their role and region;
• compare annual compensation with upper percentile indicators for the corresponding year;
• add letters from employers containing explanations regarding the elevated compensation level.

Such an approach appears in open public cases and demonstrates the general logic of what materials for this criterion might look like.

Open case descriptions mention the practice of aligning role titles across all documents

Collect annual tax certificates/equivalents, contracts, paystubs (as needed), and explanations of fluctuations.

Public cases include examples of using several authoritative compensation sources (3-5).

Open materials show comparisons of annual compensation with high percentiles. They compare annual compensation with the 90th/95th percentile for the same year in local currency. They add a brief summary with a conclusion about your percentile.

Add letter(s) from the employer justifying "why you're above market" (unique skills, critical role, direct business impact).

Yes, as sources write, sometimes one sentence from a manager in the style "he/she costs a lot, and it's justified" is enough. But, as they assure, it's better if behind that sentence there are tables, sources, and documents — then not only HR will smile, but also the USCIS officer.

Example employer letter about high compensation

(all names, company names, amounts, and figures have been changed)

Below is a generalized structure and style of a letter we have seen in several successful EB-1A/O-1 petitions. This is not a template for copying or adaptation, but only an illustration of what it might look like. Your letters must be 100% authentic and composed by your employer.

Approximate sample of a possible employer letter about high compensation (can be adapted for yourself)

What to attach to the letter as appendices

• Copy of current contract with compensation terms.
• Excerpts from two or three compensation studies with 90/95th percentiles for your role and location.
• Brief comparison table: your annual amount vs. 90/95th percentile (in local currency, same year).
• If needed — a certificate regarding bonuses/options and how they form "total compensation."

Final advice

Open sources dedicated to this criterion often emphasize the importance of clear and consistent presentation of information regarding the applicant's role, compensation level, and comparison with market indicators — who you are, how much you're paid per year, what you're comparing to, and why your number is at the top of the market. If you follow this logic, even the strictest officer will have no choice but to nod.

The final criterion, #10, is ahead: Commercial Success in the Performing Arts